The Quiet Violence of Gatekeeping

10 May

There’s a particular kind of exhaustion that settles into the body of someone who has lived inside a high-control coercive system. It’s the exhaustion of constantly explaining, constantly justifying, constantly providing context so that other people can understand what you already know in your bones. And then there is the even deeper exhaustion of being told that what you lived through wasn’t “that bad.”

If you’ve ever been on the receiving end of minimisation and invalidation…then you already know what I’m talking about.

It’s a wound survivors don’t often name because it’s not as dramatic as the story of escaping a cultic group. It’s smaller, quieter, socially acceptable - like someone placing their hand over your mouth and telling you to calm down. It’s subtle violence wrapped in professional language, academic certainty, or concern-trolling. And for many of us, it’s a familiar echo from the very systems we left.

So this is for the ones who keep asking themselves:

“Am I overreacting?”
“Did I imagine it?”
“Was it really that bad?”

The answer, in case you need it early: Yes, your experience counts, even if someone else refuses to understand or acknowledge it.

The Hierarchy of Harm (And Why It’s a Trap)

Many people have a clear picture in their mind of what a “cult” looks like. Often that picture is shaped by stories of those who survived the most extreme kinds of control - the groups that dictated daily life, limited physical contact with the outside world, monitored behaviour closely, and operated with openly known totalistic rules and expectations. These stories are real, and the impact is profound. For some survivors, those experiences form the framework through which all other forms of harm are recognised. And because of that, it’s easy for a quiet hierarchy to develop - not intentionally, and not out of a lack of empathy, but simply because our personal history becomes the lens through which we understand the world. When the harm we experienced was unmistakably extreme, other forms of coercion can seem less visible by comparison.

But coercive control doesn’t only appear at the far end of the spectrum, it shows up on a continuum - sometimes vivid and obvious, sometimes subtle and socially normalised.

Extreme forms of cultic control absolutely exist, and they involve things like:

intense surveillance
rigid control over daily life
enforced isolation
highly regulated behaviour
strict obedience to authority

These experiences are significant and deserve recognition but they’re not the only expressions of cultic or coercive dynamics. Harmful systems don’t always need to regulate someone’s entire life to have a profound impact. Sometimes the control works psychologically, spiritually, or relationally without being that same level of logistically control.

Deep harm can also emerge in the more invisible patterns:

the slow shrinking of your sense of self
the feeling that your boundaries are negotiable
the belief that questioning is a moral failure
the pressure to stay loyal, grateful, or spiritually “submitted”
the fear that disagreement risks love, belonging, or salvation
the internalised sense of being watched or evaluated
the emotional dependence on leaders with spiritual authority

These dynamics can be just as real, even if they don’t look extreme from the outside. They can take root in groups that seem strict and structured, and in those that appear modern, friendly, and culturally mainstream. When we assume harm must look a certain way it can unintentionally silence the stories that fall outside the familiar template. Not because anyone means harm, but because human beings often use what they’ve lived through as the reference point for what “counts.”
But the hierarchy of harm is a trap. It narrows our understanding of coercive control and can leave some survivors feeling unseen. It can overlook the quieter forms of erosion that happen in places where everything appears “normal.”

Coercive and cultic dynamics can come wrapped in everyday life - in community, in belonging, in faith, in leadership, in expectations that feel sacred. When we make space for all the different forms harm can take, we create a wider, more compassionate view that honours every survivor’s story. The impact is what matters, not how recognisable the setting seems from the outside.

Who Gets to Decide What Counts as a Cult?

One of the challenges in talking about cultic dynamics is that people often carry very different ideas about what those dynamics should look like. The definition of a cult has been debated by academics, professionals, and survivors for a long time. These ideas are shaped by personal experience, cultural images, the stories we’ve heard, and even the situations we’ve survived ourselves. For some, only the most extreme expressions of control feel worthy of the term. For others, the more subtle or socially accepted forms of coercion are harder to recognise, even when the impact is just as real.

It makes sense that acknowledging someone else’s story can sometimes stir feelings we aren’t prepared to face, especially if our own history sits close to the surface. And sometimes, without anyone intending harm, this can lead to a kind of quiet minimisation. Not because people are trying to silence survivors, but because expanding the definition of cultic dynamics can feel confronting, confusing, or destabilising.

Human beings often protect what feels familiar, and they protect the narratives that have helped them make sense of their own lives. For those shaped by very intense forms of control it can be difficult to imagine that something less visibly extreme could still be harmful. And for those shaped by more subtle systems, it can take years to recognise that what they experienced was indeed a cultic system.
But one thing remains consistent across the research and the lived experience of thousands of survivors: cultic dynamics are defined by behaviours, not aesthetics.
It is the pattern of control, not the outward appearance that matters.

Control can happen without physical isolation.
Coercion can happen without being in a commune.
Spiritual abuse can happen without dramatic rituals or charismatic prophets.
Psychological dependency can form in environments that look utterly ordinary from the outside.

The idea that only certain groups “qualify” can unintentionally leave many survivors unsupported and unseen. It can also prevent us from recognising harmful patterns in familiar or respected environments. Expanding our understanding doesn't erase anyone’s experience, it simply makes room for the complexity of how coercive control actually works across different cultic settings. When we allow space for that we open the door to deeper understanding and to deeper compassion for the diverse ways people survive.

When Invalidation Sounds a Lot Like the Place You Escaped

If you grew up in high-control religion, you are intimately familiar with minimisation:

“Don’t be dramatic.”
“You’re misremembering.”
“That didn’t happen.”
“It wasn’t abuse.”
“You’re too sensitive.”
“Stop exaggerating.”
“God wouldn’t want you to be bitter.”
“You’re dishonouring leadership.”

So when someone minimises your experience, it hits the same old bruise. It collapses time and brings the body back to the moment you first learned that your voice and your reality were unsafe.

Minimisation is not neutral.
It is not “just disagreement.”
It is not “just a difference of opinion.”
It is an attempt to seize narrative control.

And for survivors of coercive control, this is deeply retraumatising because it is not simply about the story, it is about who gets to author your life.

Why Survivors Shrink When Challenged

Have you noticed this? When someone questions your story, your first response is not usually anger. It’s doubt.

You freeze.
You replay everything.
You scan for proof.
You question your memory.
You shrink.

Not because you’re unsure but because your body remembers what it cost to speak up in the first place.

This is the long tail of coercive control: You learned to mistrust your inner world because an outer world demanded supremacy. So when someone tells you:
“You weren’t really in a cult,” it’s not just dismissive - it’s destabilising.

Your story is not just being invalidated, your reality is being challenged at its foundation. And that is not a small thing.

Your Story Is Valid

Even in spaces dedicated to cult recovery and spiritual abuse, people bring different levels of trauma awareness, self-reflection, and lived understanding. Titles and credentials don’t always guarantee safety or depth, which is why survivor voices and diverse perspectives are so essential. No one person or profession holds the full truth of this work, and there is room for every story that needs to be told.

Your story does not need to be sensational to be real.
You do not need to tick certain boxes for it to count.
You do not need an outsider’s approval to name spiritual abuse.
You do not need to justify your survival.

Some of the most oppressive systems in the world look normal from the outside.
That is why they are so hard to leave and that is why minimisation is so dangerous.

There Are People Who Will Understand

This part is for your heart:

There are people, many of them, who hear your story and exhale because they finally see themselves.

There are people who had the same experience but have never named it aloud.

There are people who grew up in families, churches, and movements that looked shiny on the outside but were built on fear internally.

There are people who learned to spiritualise their own harm because the alternative was too overwhelming.

There are people who left with nothing and needed to build their life from scratch – either internally or externally, or both.

They don’t need your story to match theirs.
They don’t need your trauma to be identical.
They don’t need your suffering to meet an external threshold.
They don’t need you to prove yourself.

For the Survivor Reading This Who Doubts Their Story

You can borrow this if you need it:

You didn’t imagine it.
You weren’t “too sensitive.”
You didn’t misunderstand.
You didn’t exaggerate.
You weren’t the problem.
You weren’t overreacting.
You were conditioned to minimise what happened to you.
And that conditioning does not get the final word.

I’ve said this before, but it feels important to repeat: The most radical thing a survivor can do is tell their story without asking for permission.

You don’t owe anyone a performance of suffering.
You don’t owe anyone a specific narrative arc.
You don’t owe anyone a label they feel more comfortable with.
You don’t owe anyone silence because your truth challenges their worldview.

Your story exists.
Your body remembers it.
Your recovery give evidence to it.

And no one, no matter how credentialed or confident, gets to take that from you.

Work with me: If you're navigating religious trauma or cult recovery, I offer individual coaching, group support, and coaching packages. Learn more about how we can work together.
Connect on Instagram: Follow along for insights, resources, and community.
Check Out The Religious Trauma Collective: Looking for more support and connection? The Religious Trauma Collective offers resources, community, and advocacy for anyone impacted by religious harm.